Everybody is on the RUN→ From Nadir Ahmed!
But, who Nadir Ahmed is running from and
why?
By:
Shahid Bin Waheed شاهد
بن وحيد
بسم الله الرحمن
الرحيم
الحمدلله
رب العالمين والصلوة
والسلام على اشرف
الانبياء وسيدالمرسلين
نبينا محمد صل
ا لله عليه وعلى
آله واصحابه وازواجه
اجمعين - امابعد
Thanks to be Allaah, Sustainer of the Universe, and blessing and salutation to be the most distinguish of the Messengers and foremost among the Prophets, our Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allaah be on him and on his wives, children and Companions.
Nadir
Ahmed is an orator [of absurdities
and insignificance], a public nuisance with his “can” full of
half-baked disinformation Nadir Ahmed
is a king of ignorance. Nadir Ahmed must be credited for increasing prejudices and hostilities
between Christians and Muslims, especially in the USA. However, many Muslim
bigots and/or their websites consider Nadir
Ahmed, a hero, without knowing the truth
and/or scrutinizing his knowledge and work. Anyone who visits Nadir Ahmed’s examinethettruth.com immediately observe the following slogans’:
There are much more absurdities at Nadir Ahmed’s website, but we will address
the last and most recent i.e. Prophet
of Doom’s Craig Winn on the RUN! In this autopsy while exposing Nadir Ahmed’s ignorance [of Islaam mainly, especially of
Glorious Qur’aan],
Nadir Ahmed’s unIslaamic and plain evil
methods to approach and attacks others. It has always been Nadir Ahmed’s practice to approach people
with deception, false claims, self-serving desires (to use them).
Following are few examples, which has been used by Nadir Ahmed to anger people:
Nadir Ahmed claimed and/or wrote under subject: CHALLENGE TO DEBATE
ALI SINA
“Alhumdulilah, the following anti Islamic personalities
have been wiped out, exposed as frauds, and have fallen to the Sword of Islam!” [For hurling insults and attacks by Nadir Ahmed, read the post]
Nadir Ahmed wrote [excerpt]:
“I'm a Muslim apologist and I am currently
having a dialogue with some Christians about Islam and Christianity. I have
posed some questions to the Christians which they admitted they did not have
the answers to.”
There are too many examples and too much absurd claims made
by Nadir
Ahmed, which
would require dozens of pages to describe and comment upon them. Therefore,
rather wasting any further time, we would proceed to scrutinize Prophet of Doom’s Craig Winn on the RUN! Please be advised that this
author by no means is defending anyone here and/or agree with
them/him/her. The sole objective of this scrutiny is to examine Nadir Ahmed’s knowledge, methods and practices
in the light of common sense, reason and mainly according to Islaamic Shariah.
Nadir
Ahmed writes:
Craig "The Coward" Winn, who wrote a silly little book called Prophet of Doom, has refused the challenge for a public debate on Islam. This chicken hearted coward knows very well that if he were to accept the challenge of debate, he would be "schooled" badly. His pack of lies and misrepresentations would be uncovered in broad day light. Craig Winn is only willing to do some kind of weird paper exchange. You can imagine the reaction if John Kerry refused to debate George Bush and instead suggested to do some written paper exercises J . Craig Winn’s retreat was a terrible embarrassment for his flock of followers, and even worse, he loses credibility and can not be taken seriously.
Nadir
Ahmed always begins his rhetoric with
hurling attack, insults and/or inflammatory statements while being judgmental. Had
Nadir Ahmed been honest and sincere, he could have written a rebuttal
and published that at his website and let the readers draw their own
conclusions.
Nadir
Ahmed writes:
Craig Winn
represents a growing number of Chrisitan "pseudo Islam experts" who are beginning to realize
that Muslim scholars, intellectuals and apologists are now hunting them down
for the purpose of exposing the misinformation and false scholarship in
their works, which they can not defend.
Readers
should notice that in the statement highlighted above Nadir Ahmed
has referred himself as Muslim scholar and/or intellectual and/or apologist (which he has claimed many time, espousing the doubt that
perhaps, Islaam is not a perfect religion, which is not true, there is no such
thing as “alleged apologist” in Islaam.). The only person hunting down
people with his barrage of insults,
personal attacks and inflammatory statements is, no other than Nadir Ahmed,
himself.
Nadir
Ahmed writes:
What I found
most disturbing about this charlatan, was his rude and offensive smears of
Prophet of Islam. In our exchange. This
guy thought that he could "score points" by hurling insults and
slanders at the Prophet Muhammed (P). This of course, put me in a really bad situation.
Because the Noble Quran states:
6:68. And when you (Muhammad SAW) see those who engage in a false conversation about
Our Verses (of the Qur'ân) by mocking at them, stay away from them till they
turn to another topic. And if Shaitân (Satan) causes you to forget, then
after the remembrance sit not you in the company of those people who are the Zâliműn
(polytheists and wrongdoers, etc.).
The only thing disturbing about this charlatan is that Nadir Ahmed has been the perpetrator and initiator
of Fitnah فتنة. As far as the enemies of Islaam are
concerned, they have been doing it since the birth of Islaam, so nothing new
about that. Now, Nadir Ahmed
conveniently using Glorious Qur’aan آيه 6:68 as scapegoat, while also giving a false impression
of his non-existing knowledge of Qur’aan/Islaam to ignorant Muslims in
particular and others in general with his copy and paste. Had Nadir Ahmed possessed knowledge of Qur’aan and Islaam with
understanding not to mention had he been honest, he would have never approached and/or initiated attacks. Nadir Ahmed, knew well and clear that those, he is approaching with his
attacks, insults, and inflammatory statements have already been spewing venom
against Islaam, Glorious Qur’aan and Prophet of Islaam, Muhammad صلی الله عليه
وسلم,
therefore, the entire blame is on Nadir Ahmed for (a)
For violating Qur’aanic injunction (b) Causing further prejudice against Islaam
and Muslims (c) And when losing and/or not succeeding, then hiding behind
Qur’aanic injunction, which clearly says:
Surah Al-An'am 68
وَإِذَا
رَأَيْتَ الَّذِينَ
يَخُوضُونَ فِي
آيَاتِنَا فَأَعْرِضْ
عَنْهُمْ حَتَّى
يَخُوضُوا فِي
حَدِيثٍ غَيْرِهِ
وَإِمَّا يُنْسِيَنَّكَ
الشَّيْطَانُ
فَلَا تَقْعُدْ
بَعْدَ الذِّكْرَى
مَعَ الْقَوْمِ
الظَّالِمِينَ
And when you (Muhammad صلی الله عليه وسلم) see those who engage in a false conversation about Our Verses (of the Qur’ân) by mocking at them, stay away from them till they turn to another topic. And if Shaitân (Satan) causes you to forget, then after the remembrance sit not you in the company of those people who are the Zâliműn (polytheists and wrong-doers).
Most of the readers may not know
that Nadir Ahmed, does not possess any proper Islaamic upbringing and
Islaamic education [تعليمِ
دينی]
and he does not understand Arabic. But
the question that begs for an answer is that which part of {English translation of Ayaah آيه 6:68} Nadir Ahmed has used
as his excuse he [Nadir Ahmed] does not understand? Which clearly says: “And when
you (Muhammad صلی
الله عليه وسلم) see those who engage in a false
conversation about Our Verses (of the Qur’ân) by mocking at them.” That would lead us to conclude one of the two
things:
1. Nadir Ahmed is lying through his teeth while using Qur’aan 6:68 as excuse, or
2. Nadir Ahmed does not even possess the capacity to read and comprehend English.
In Arabic, the
use of the word يَخُوضُونَ that means indulge and/or engage is self-explanatory. The Ayaah آيه 6:68 is general
command to everyone to turn away from the gathering where Islaam, Qur’aan and
Prophet of Islaam صلی الله
عليه وسلم have been mocked. This would mean that Nadir Ahmed is just
like those people, who now he is to blame according to Glorious Qur’aan Ayaah آيه 4:140,
Surah An-Nisaa 140
وَقَدْ
نَزَّلَ عَلَيْكُمْ
فِي الْكِتَابِ
أَنْ إِذَا سَمِعْتُمْ
آيَاتِ اللَّهِ
يُكْفَرُ بِهَا
وَيُسْتَهْزَأُ
بِهَا فَلَا تَقْعُدُوا
مَعَهُمْ حَتَّى
يَخُوضُوا فِي
حَدِيثٍ غَيْرِهِ
إِنَّكُمْ
إِذًا مِثْلُهُمْ إِنَّ
اللَّهَ جَامِعُ
الْمُنَافِقِينَ
وَالْكَافِرِينَ
فِي جَهَنَّمَ
جَمِيعًا
And it has already been revealed to you in the Book (this Qur’ân)
that when you hear the Verses of Allâh being denied and mocked at, then sit not
with them, until they engage in a talk other than that; (but if
you stayed with them) certainly in that case you would be like them. Surely,
Allâh will collect the hypocrites and disbelievers all together in Hell.
In
case of Nadir Ahmed, we cannot give him the benefit of doubt, applying the
part/phrase of Ayaah آيه 6:68 (used
by Nadir Ahmed as his source) i.e.
وَإِمَّا
يُنْسِيَنَّكَ
الشَّيْطَانُ (And if Satan makes
you forget); because we see a unbroken
pattern where Nadir Ahmed has knowingly approached those who have been engaged showing,
uttering and publishing extreme hostility towards Islaam, Glorious Qur’aan and
Prophet of Islaam صلی الله
عليه وسلم. And Nadir Ahmed did it all for self-glorification and/or for cheap publicity.
Nadir
Ahmed writes:
Therefore, Muslims are not obligated to take abuse
from Christians, rather, we
should just get up and leave. Nevertheless,
honest criticism on Islam is very much encouraged as stated in Surah 4:82.
It is also important to note that simply "returning fire" and
slandering Christianity is strictly forbidden in Islam (S. 6:108 , S. 29:46).
If you read the exchange, you will see that I tried my best to reach out to
Craig Winn and keep things civil and respectful. But Craig Winn was clearly
taking advantage of Islam’s good will to humanity. Therefore, I had no choice
but to terminate the conversation.
This is
the culmination of ignorance and readers should notice in the first
phrase highlighted Nadir Ahmed is suggesting that, Muslims are obligated to take abuse by
all others beside Christians. Whereas the Ayaah آيه 6:68 does not suggest something close to
that effect. Master ignorant Nadir Ahmed goes on to say (highlighted in green) ► Nevertheless, honest criticism
on Islam is very much encouraged as stated in Surah 4:82◄ This is the most
absurd and fallacious claim ever made, even non-Muslims do better while talking
about Qur’aan, let us read the Ayaah آيه 4:84,
Surah An-Nisaa 82
Do they not then consider the Qur’ân carefully? Had it been from
other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein many a contradiction.
First, the context is found in Ayaat آيات 4:81-82,
Surah An-Nisaa 81-82
وَيَقُولُونَ
طَاعَةٌ فَإِذَا
بَرَزُوا مِنْ
عِنْدِكَ بَيَّتَ
طَائِفَةٌ مِنْهُمْ
غَيْرَ الَّذِي
تَقُولُ وَاللَّهُ
يَكْتُبُ مَا يُبَيِّتُونَ
فَأَعْرِضْ عَنْهُمْ
وَتَوَكَّلْ عَلَى
اللَّهِ وَكَفَى
بِاللَّهِ وَكِيلًا
(81) أَفَلَا
يَتَدَبَّرُونَ
الْقُرْآنَ وَلَوْ
كَانَ مِنْ عِنْدِ
غَيْرِ اللَّهِ
لَوَجَدُوا فِيهِ
اخْتِلَافًا كَثِيرًا
(82)
They say: "We are
obedient," but when they leave you (Muhammad صلى
الله عليه وسلم), a section of them spend all night in
planning other than what you say. But Allâh records their nightly (plots). So
turn aside from them (do not punish them), and put your trust in Allâh. And
Allâh is Ever All-Sufficient as a Disposer of affairs. Do
they not then consider the Qur’ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh,
they would surely have found therein many a contradiction.
Nevertheless, the Ayaah آيه 4:82 is not even close to an invitation
for alleged honest criticism as fallaciously asserted by ignorant of
Islaam and Glorious Qur’aan [i.e. Nadir Ahmed]. It in fact, shows that Nadir Ahmed uses
Internet as his source with CAP [copy and paste], he has not read and
understood the Qur’aan.
The Ayaah آيه 4:82 begins with أَفَلَا
يَتَدَبَّرُونَ
الْقُرْآنَ (Do they not,
then, ponder in the Qur’aan). Through this Ayaah (verse) Allaah invites
people to deliberate in the Qur’aan (not so-called honest criticism according to
Nadir
Ahmed the ignorant of Qur’aan). First of all because the words
used are: أَفَلَا
يَتَدَبَّرُونَ (Do they not, then, ponder…). The
obvious message in the Ayaah آيه 4:82 is to look at the Qur’aan deeply, and
no one would find discrepancy in its words and meanings. It shows the
impotency of Nadir
Ahmed, his knowledge and also those who also rely on Internet and always
use English translation of the meaning of Qur’aan. They will always remain is DARK
and without proper knowledge and understanding. The Arabic word تَدَبَّرُون can never be translated and/or taken
to suggest honest criticism. In fact, it again suggests that Nadir Ahmed does not
even possess the capacity to read and comprehend the English translation of
Qur’aan.
Nadir
Ahmed writes:
It is also important to note that simply
"returning fire" and slandering Christianity is strictly forbidden in
Islam (S. 6:108 , S. 29:46).
If you read the exchange, you will see that I tried my best to reach out to
Craig Winn and keep things civil and respectful. But Craig Winn was clearly
taking advantage of Islam’s good will to humanity. Therefore, I had no choice
but to terminate the conversation.
Exposition
In the same passage Nadir Ahmed continues and writes the above
absurdities with his disinformation. Nadir
Ahmed’s claim is as usual fallacious and he again is using Qur’aan
as scapegoat when he said that I quote: ► It is also important to note that
simply "returning fire" and slandering Christianity is strictly
forbidden in Islam (S. 6:108 , S. 29:46). ◄ let me set the record straight that Glorious Qur’aan does not
give any status to Christianity. But before I comment about the Shariah ruling
on the subject matter, let us examine the Ayaat آيات 6:108 & 29:46 quoted and/or used as reference by Nadir Ahmed.
Surah Al-An'am 108
وَلَا
تَسُبُّوا الَّذِينَ
يَدْعُونَ مِنْ
دُونِ اللَّهِ
فَيَسُبُّوا اللَّهَ
عَدْوًا بِغَيْرِ
عِلْمٍ كَذَلِكَ
زَيَّنَّا لِكُلِّ
أُمَّةٍ عَمَلَهُمْ
ثُمَّ إِلَى رَبِّهِمْ
مَرْجِعُهُمْ
فَيُنَبِّئُهُمْ
بِمَا كَانُوا
يَعْمَلُونَ
And insult not those whom they (disbelievers) worship besides
Allâh, lest they insult Allâh wrongfully without knowledge. Thus We have made
fair-seeming to each people its own doings; then to their Lord is their return
and He shall then inform them of all that they used to do.
Surah Al-'Ankabut 46
وَلَا
تُجَادِلُوا أَهْلَ
الْكِتَابِ إِلَّا
بِالَّتِي هِيَ
أَحْسَنُ إِلَّا
الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا
مِنْهُمْ وَقُولُوا
آمَنَّا بِالَّذِي
أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْنَا
وَأُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكُمْ
وَإِلَهُنَا وَإِلَهُكُمْ
وَاحِدٌ وَنَحْنُ
لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ
And argue not with the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), unless it be in (a way) that is better (with good words and in good manner, inviting them to Islâmic Monotheism with His Verses), except with such of them as do wrong; and say (to them): "We believe in that which has been revealed to us and revealed to you; our Ilâh (God) and your Ilâh (God) is One (i.e. Allâh), and to Him we have submitted (as Muslims)."
Nadir
Ahmed has made a
gross error by citing Ayaah آيه 6:108 here, because the reasons for
revelation اسباب النزول including the meaning and message is completely
different and does not apply on the particular issue in hand. But again, as
usual Nadir
Ahmed has relied on English translation of Qur’aan rather the teaching
of Qur’aan with its meaning and message. The translation in any language would
never help one to understand and deliberate on issues. However, the 2nd
quote and/or reference of Ayaah آيه 29:46 is correct but deduction drawn from
both references is highly fallacious [i.e. It is also important
to note that simply "returning fire" and slandering Christianity is
strictly forbidden in Islam (S. 6:108 , S. 29:46).]
Glorious Qur’aan 29:46!
Surah Al-'Ankabut 46
وَلَا
تُجَادِلُوا أَهْلَ
الْكِتَابِ إِلَّا
بِالَّتِي هِيَ
أَحْسَنُ إِلَّا
الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا
مِنْهُمْ وَقُولُوا
آمَنَّا بِالَّذِي
أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْنَا
وَأُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكُمْ
وَإِلَهُنَا وَإِلَهُكُمْ
وَاحِدٌ وَنَحْنُ
لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ
And argue not with the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), unless it be in (a way) that is better (with good words and in good manner, inviting them to Islâmic Monotheism with His Verses), except with such of them as do wrong; and say (to them): "We believe in that which has been revealed to us and revealed to you; our Ilâh (God) and your Ilâh (God) is One (i.e. Allâh), and to Him we have submitted (as Muslims)."
Let me again point out that Glorious Qur’aan does not give any status
to Christianity. I am not sure why Nadir Ahmed has singled out Christianity
and emphasizing on it without supporting evidence. Nevertheless, Nadir Ahmed has as usual
misunderstood the Qur’aanic Ayaah آيه 29:46, which he obviously has heard (and
perhaps not read and understood even the English translation of it).
Otherwise, he would have avoided this blunder; the Ayaah آيه
29:46 begins with phrase وَلَا
تُجَادِلُوا
أَهْلَ
الْكِتَابِ
إِلَّا
بِالَّتِي
هِيَ أَحْسَنُ (And do not
debate with the people of the Book unless it is in the best way) then the Ayaah
says إِلَّا
الَّذِينَ
ظَلَمُوا (except those from them who commit injustice). The
meaning and message is obvious that those who wronged you in that they stuck to
their stubbornness and obstinacy in response to your dignified gentle speech; they do not
deserve this kindness from you. If you give them tit for tat, you are
justified, although it is still preferable that they are not replied with
rudeness for rudeness and cruelly for their cruelty.
Similar message is echoed
in another Ayaah آيه 16:126,
For this purpose, by saying ÷ óOçGö6s%%tć bÎ)ur (And
if you were to harm them in retaliation, harm them to the measure you were
harmed). And if you opt for patience, it is definitely much better
for those who are patient. Thus, the noble workers of Allaah (SWT) are given
the legal right that it is permissible for them to retaliate against
injustice done to them. But this is subject to condition that retaliation
should not exceed the measure of injustice done. At the end of the Ayaah advice
is given that though you have the right to retaliate, but patience is better.
Let me also point out that these Ayaat are about the
dealings with people of the Book, and not today’s Christians’ mainly in Europe
and North America, since the Protestants are heretics and they cannot be
considered even Christians’ let alone people of the Book. Their cult was born
in 16th century. Hundreds of years after arrival of Islaam and
revelation of Glorious Qur’aan. Finally, we can say with confidence after
citing the facts, that Nadir Ahmed is as usual dead wrong with his fallacious assertions.
Conclusion!
Nadir
Ahmed has declared everyone to be on the
run after attacking, hurling insults not to mention approaching them with his
non-existing knowledge of Islaam and his high-flying claims. Thereafter, to
save the face, he has always used Islaam and Glorious Qur’aan with distorted
meanings to fit his excuses and/or agenda. Nadir
Ahmed is in a habit to crunch the truth
to fit his theories.
So what about Nadir Ahmed, why is
he on the run and why he has even criminally hacked and shut down the websites
of those who have dared to challenge Nadir Ahmed? And why Nadir Ahmed does not apply the same rule and logic
to himself for dodging the open public debate, which he applies on others?
YES! Folks, I am the one who
challenged Nadir Ahmed for an open
public debate in front of video camera and the result was that Nadir Ahmed has been on the run since
then, like hell, while he has hacked my
wife’s website with hundred of articles and refutation and my website with also
hundreds of articles and refutations (years of
work). Click on ON
THE RUN & STILL
ON THE RUN. And for proof of Nadir
Ahmed’s criminal acts and then bragging
click on Confession
of Nadir Ahmed.
Again, my challenge for an open public debate to Nadir Ahmed
[or others named] is open 24/7/365 for which I am willing to travel to Chicago,
where Nadir Ahmed lives somewhere in a sewer, and would love to debate with him on
the same subjects [or any as well], Nadir Ahmed has
allegedly already debated and/or have written [mostly gaga-caca] and
I would love to expose his ignorance while showing the world that Nadir Ahmed is just hot air and no weight, who must be ignored like a gas bubble of an old meal!
Monday,
October 24, 2004