My Challenge and Direct Questions to Jochan Katz!

 

By: Shahid Bin Waheed

 

For those who may still not be certain about the Christian Bible or the Bible at large, I must inform you that neither the Jews and nor the Christians can present any evidence establishing through the authentic chain of unbroken record or transmission that the Bible in general or Jewish Bible and Christian Bible were ever preserved and survived. And the current Bible books are the same as they were inspired or revealed? If anyone can prove this provided that all the Judeo-Christian scholars unanimously accept that proof, I will pay $ 10,000.00 as reward to that individual, group, of else?

 

What I am about to present below is taken from Christian sources including KJV Bible that will give a shocking surprise to the readers. Please feel free to verify all the sources and references.

 

Email to Jochan Katz!

 

Date:

Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:24:18 -0800 (PST)

From:

"This is me:)" <sbwus@yahoo.com> | Add to Address Book

Subject:

Direct questions to Jochan Katz

To:

"Jochen Katz" <jokatz@gmx.de>

 

Greetings Mr. Jochan Katz

I like to know few things about the Gospel that Jesus was allegedly preaching, such as:

Where is that Gospel?
Where and how it was preserved, please support your response with authentic chain of unbroken transmission?
What is the story behind these alleged Gospels according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and John?
Where we can find the explicit proof with authentic unbroken chain of transmission that these four individuals were actually disciples of Jesus?
Christians’ record itself testifies that these four so-called gospels were written generations after Jesus. SO WHAT WAS JESUS PREACHING IN HIS LIFETIME, while these gospels were not in existence?
If anything that you claim to be inspired and/or coming from Jesus and Paul, please present the evidence that it was in fact preserved with authentic chain of unbroken transmission?

Please do not send in any links from your web site or else. Since you have nothing there except material to stupefy people. I like to have answers from you as a fact of acceptance. Nothing less than that will be accepted.

Regards
SBW

Two responses by Jochan Katz!

 

From:

"Jochen Katz" <jokatz@gmx.de> | Add to Address Book

To:

"This is me:)" <sbwus@yahoo.com>

 

 

Subject:

Re: Direct questions to Jochan Katz

Date:

Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:47:55 +0100

 

Mr. SBW,

 

greetings in the name of the Lord.

 

I have a problem with your "request". I never refuse to answer

to questions coming from a serious seeker of truth. However,

your first sentence after your list of "questions" gives it away

that you are not seeking truth. You demand:

 

Please do not send in any links from your web site or else. ...

I like to have answers from you ... Nothing less than that

will be accepted.

 

Many Muslims claim "seek knowledge even if you have to go to

China to find it" i.e. wherever you can find it. And this is the sign

of a true seeker, he wants the truth and does not care whether it

is a source "of his liking" or not.

 

Your demand indicates that you seek to get into an argument with

me as a person, but are not actually interested to get good answers

to your questions. If it were the truth, if it were good solid answers

for your questions that you are seeking then you would be glad to

be pointed to webpages or books that answer your questions. But

you do not want those, i.e. you are not desperate to get answers.

 

But if you are not interested in the answers, but in getting into

an argument with me personally, then I have to say: I am only

interested to invest time and effort in answering people who

seek truth.  Thus, the discussion ends right here.

 

May the Lord give you a true thirst for truth,

a desire for the truth that is not satisfied with

superficial answers.

 

Jochen Katz

 

 

 Email sent by brother Hesham Azmy to SBW & Jochan Katz!

 

From:

"Hesham Azmy" <noorullah48@hotmail.com> | Add to Address Book

To:

"This is me:)" <sbwus@yahoo.com>, "Jochen Katz" <jokatz@gmx.de>

 

Subject:

Re: Direct questions to Jochan Katz

Date:

Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:27:35 +0200

 

 Very legitimate questions, I believe.

 

peace,
Hesham
http://www.geocities.com/noorullahwebsite/

 

 Jochan Katz’s response!

 

From:

"Jochen Katz" <jokatz@gmx.de> | Add to Address Book

To:

"Hesham Azmy" <noorullah48@hotmail.com>, "This is me:)" <sbwus@yahoo.com>

 

Subject:

Re: Direct questions to Jochan Katz

Date:

Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:22:03 +0100

 

> Very legitimate questions, I believe.
 
I don't have a problem with the question, 
but with the attitude.
 
Jochen Katz

 

Response by brother Hesham Azmy to Jochan Katz!

 

From:

"Hesham Azmy" <noorullah48@hotmail.com> | Add to Address Book

To:

"Jochen Katz" <jokatz@gmx.de>, "This is me:)" <sbwus@yahoo.com>

 

Subject:

Re: Direct questions to Jochan Katz

Date:

Thu, 30 Oct 2003 02:01:39 +0200

 

  Mr. Jochen, this is a challenge not a "request". Seeking knowledge or "truth" from you is quite irrelevant.

 

peace,
Hesham
http://www.geocities.com/noorullahwebsite/

 

We find excessive use and abuse of the word “mantra” at website “answering {assaulting}-islam” by Jochan Katz, Sam Shamoun, Silas and others. The following facts will shatter anti-Islaam “mantra” but will expose their counterfeit Bible and their perjuries as well.

 

Let me start claiming that Gospel of Christ existed in the time of disciples of Jesus. The evidence of this we find in the testimony by “Eichhorn” and many other German scholars. Also scholars like Leclerc, Grabe, Michael, Lessing, Niemeyer and Marsh concur this opinion.

 

Even Paul said in II Cor, 11:12-13!

11:12 But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we.
11:13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

 

Adam Clarke under his comments of this verse said:

 

“They falsely claimed to be the Apostles of Christ while in fact they were not Apostles. They used to deliver sermons and take pains in worship but they aimed at nothing but their personal interests.”

 

We read the following in the same context in the First Epistle of John:

 

I John 4:1

4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

 

Here John also joined Paul in admitting the presence of false prophets during their time. Adam Clarke made the following comments on I John 4:1 cited above:

 

“In the past every teacher used to claim that he received inspiration from Holy Ghost, because every true prophet received inspiration. The “word” spirit at this place signifies the man claiming that he was under the effect of the spirit. Put them therefore to test. Such preachers should be examined with arguments. His phrase “many false prophets” refers to those who were not inspired by the Holy Ghost especially from among the Jews.”

 

At this point I like to remind the Muslim readers to note that how fraudulently these Christian clergy/missionary take the above verse (I John 4:1) out of context and some time apply on Muhammad (SAW), which in fact, according to Bible commentary and Christian scholars is about their own con artists and false prophets among their own.

 

Historian Mosheim on page 65 in volume. 1 of his history (printed in 1832) said:

 

“Among the followers of Plato and Pythagoras it was considered not only admissible but credible to tell a lie and deceive others in the cause of truth. As is understood from the ancient books, the first to indulge in this practice were the Jews of Egypt, in the time before Christ. This unholy act was later on borrowed by the Christians, a fact which is clear from the many books that were falsely attributed to great personalities.”

 

It can be understood now from the above quotation that why a large number of false books were written and falsely attributed to others in the name of religion, cause and truth. That is where all these gospels according to ???? Came into existence based on sheer fabrication.

 

Eusebuis said in chapter 18 of volume 4 of his history:

 

“Justin the Martyr related many of the prophecies of Christ and claimed that the Jews excluded them from the Holy Scriptures.”

Watson also said on page 32 of volume 2 of his book:

 

“I have no trace of doubt about the passages that Justin quoted in his polemic against a Jew, that, in the time of Justin and Irenaeus, they were part of the Hebrew and Greek versions of the Bible, while today they no longer exist. Especially the text that Justin claimed was part of the Book of Jeremiah. Sylbergius in his annotation of Justin, and Dr. Grabe in his annotation of Irenaeus, pointed out that this prophecy was before Peter when he wrote the text of chapter 4 verse 6 of his epistle.”

 

Testimony of a Jewish Scholar Reverted to Islaam!

 

During the time of Sultan Bayazid of Turkey (son of Great Sultan Muhammad Fateh, who defeated and destroyed Roman Empire forever and purify Turkey from Mushrikeen and earned the Jannah as predicted by Muhammad (SAW) a Jewish scholar embraced Islaam. He was given the Islaamic name Abdu’s Salam, who wrote a book named Risalatu’l-Hidayah (The book of Guidance) repudiating the Jews. In the 3rd part of this book he said:

 

“The most celebrated of all the commentaries on the Pentateuch (Torah) is the one known as Talmud, which was written in the period of Ptolemy who reigned some time after the period of Nebuchadnezzar. This commentary contains the following story. It happened that once Ptolemy asked some Jewish scholars to bring the Pentateuch into his presence. The scholars were frightened, because the King disbelieved in some of its injunctions. Seventy scholars gathered together and what they did was change those things that he (Ptolemy) did not believe in. Now when they admit to having done this, how can one trust a single verse of such a book?”

 

The Rees Encyclopedia under the entry of “Bible” in volume 4 contains the following statement:

 

“Presenting the argument in favor of those versions of Old Testament that were written from 1000 to 1400, he said that all the versions written in the seventh and the eighth centuries had been destroyed by the order of the Jewish Council because they were contrary to their own versions. In view of this event Watson also said that the versions which were complied six hundred years ago are not available and versions written seven hundred years or eight hundred years ago do not exist all.”

 

The above admission is from Dr. Kennicott, the most trusted scholar and author of the Old Testament.

 

History tells us that it is impossible for any record or document many have survived under following calamities:

 

1.      In the year 64, which was the time of Nero, Peter, his wife and Paul were murdered in Rome.

2.      Emperor Domitian, who like the emperor Nero was not fond of the Christian faith issued an order to kill the Christians. This massacre seriously endangered Christianity leading to exile of John and murder of Philip Clement.

3.      In the year 101 Emperor Trajan (Trajan ruled for 18 years) murders of the Bishop of Corinth (Ignatius), Bishop of Rome (Clement) and the Bishop of Jerusalem (Simon) took place.

4.      During the reign of emperor Septimius thousands of Christians were killed in Egypt alone. Similarly in France and Carthage Christians were also massacred in large number to the extent that they thought the time of “antichrist” had arrived.

5.      Another large massacre of Christian is recorded in the year 161 by the hands of emperor Marcus Antonius. This lasted for a period of ten years killing large number of Christians in the East and West.

6.      In the year 237 emperor Maximus started killing the Christians. Almost all the Christian scholars were killed at his orders. The Popes Pontian and Fabian were also killed. This elimination of Christian scholars made emperor Maximus to rule with ease.

7.      The year 253 was the period of emperor Decius, who had firmly resolved to root out the Christian faith and obliterate all signs of its existence. His orders resulted in great number of Christians abandoned their faith. Egypt, Africa, Italy and cities in the East were main target of this eradication.

8.      During the year 274 the emperor Aurelian issued orders for killing the Christian, but himself was killed before much loss of Christian lives.

9.      A great massacre of Christian started in the years 302. The city of Phrygia was burned to the ground leaving no one alive.

10.    Famous Roman emperor Diocletian ruled from 284-305. He persecuted the Christians because he felt the increasing power of the Church endangered his kingdom. Diocletian obliterated every trace of sacred books, demolished the Churches, burned all books, and prevented Christians from worshipping in the form of congregation. Extensive details of these can be found in the history books. Lardner said on page 22 of the 7th volume of his book:

 

“Diocletian passed orders that churches be abolished and books be burnt.”

 

He further said:

 

“Eusebius has given an eye-witness account of the event in a painful tone, “I have seen with my own eye the demolition of the churches and the burning of the sacred books in public places.”

 

The reason why I have cited these historical accounts in brief is to show that there is no way during that era of Christianity, this slowly growing cult in small number could have been able to sustain all kind of loses, but still manage to preserve their sacred scripture; knowing the fact that Injeel of Îsâ Ibn Maryam was never documented. Gospel of Christ (whatever it was, because no one seems to know much about it; except that it existed) stands no chance of survival and preservation under these historical accounts.

 

Jesus himself caused the loss of his message according to the Bible!

 

There are countless examples of ambiguities found in the Christian Bible in the statements reportedly uttered by Jesus. These ambiguities have caused too much confusion that even Jesus’ family; disciples and people around him were not able to understand his message unless Jesus himself elucidated it. But there are a considerable number of statements, which remained to be obscure and ambiguous. Let me quote few of them to make my point.

 

I

 

In John 3:3-4 we read the following:

 

3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
3:4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born
?

 

We find this dialogue to be over in John 3:10 (also read verses 5-9)

 

3:10 Jesus answered and said unto him, Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?

 

The above reference shows that Jesus was a master of confusion and he was not a good teacher since he left his own message unexplained. But something like this is unthinkable for Îsâ Ibn Maryam.

 

II

 

In John chapter 6 we read that Jesus is addressing the Jews in following fashion:

 

6:48 I am that bread of life.
6:49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
6:50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
6:51 I am the living bread, which came down from heaven: if any man eats of this bread, he shall live forever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
6:52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
6:53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
6:54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
6:55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
6:56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
6:57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

6:60 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?
6:61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?
6:62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?
6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
6:64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
6:66 From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

 

Christians make a big deal out of this unexplained part of the Bible, especially Catholics. But Jesus never elaborated what he was talking about even many of his disciples abandoned him? It raises another question that how than they can still be called twelve when one betrayed him and many among the rest of the eleven abandoned him?

 

Few more examples of Jesus’ confused, incomplete, inconclusive and ambiguous teachings that Jesus never elucidated can be found in:

 

John 8:21-22; John 8:51-52; John 11:11-14; Matthew 16:6-12; Luke 8:52-53; Luke 9:44-45.

 

But Jesus’ statement in Luke 18:31-34 tops it all!

 

18:31 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished.
18:32 For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on:
18:33 And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again.
18:34 And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things, which were spoken.

 

It is the second mention but the disciples still did not understand this saying even the above statement has no ambiguity in it. The disciples being Jews or Gentiles or combination have heard from the Jews that Christ would be the king. Now at the appearance of Christ (?) and after embracing his faith, the disciples were looking forward to the time when they would sit on the royal throne with Christ. Their firm belief was also based because Jesus himself had promised them that they would sit on twelve thrones, and each of them would rule over the people of the one tribe of the Israelites. This false promise of Jesus and his claim raises the same question again that I posed earlier: how than they can still be called twelve when one betrayed him and many among the rest of the eleven abandoned him? Also after many-abandoned Jesus that leaves much less than twelve, so who will rule the rest of the twelve tribes of Israelites?

 

Conclusion!

 

The brief account presented above from the history and the Bible lead us to believe that there was no attempt to preserve the Bible and/or any book of the Bible. In fact we don’t even have an authentic chain of unbroken transmission that can establish today’s fabricated Bible assembled on faded memory of actual teachings and/or on hearsay. Another problem Christians’ fabricated Bible has the Jesus talked too much, perhaps to show off or else, but most of the time he never elucidated what he uttered as we find in current gospels? So how one can rely of such religion and book? No wonder there are 94, 000 sects and 250,000 denominations with 100s of Bible versions. Historical record and Bible  (briefly cited above) itself testify that it is impossible that the claims of Bible to be inspired word of God be true. Would you attend the class of that teacher who never teaches you and/or never explain what he is talking about? Do you think that you stand a chance to pass that class? It is the same with Christianity; you will flunk the class and will never make it. Islaam is the ONLY solution for your salvation.

 

Also read:

My challenge and people on the RUN.

 

Home Page