Jesus said: It is not fair to take the children's bread

and throw it to the dogs (Gentiles).

Exclusive club of Jesus, where dogs (Gentiles) are not welcome!

 

 

By: Shahid Bin Waheed شاهد بن وحيد

 

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

الحمدلله رب العالمين والصلوة والسلام على اشرف الانبياء وسيدالمرسلين نبينا محمد صل ا لله عليه وعلى آله واصحابه وازواجه اجمعين – امابعد

Thanks be to Allaah, Sustainer of the Universe, and blessing and salutation to be the most distinguish of the Messengers and foremost among the Prophets, our Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allaah be on him and on his wives, children and Companions.

 

In the Gospel according to Matthew we read the following explicit passage, which exposes Jesus to be the most racist individual in the known history.

 

Matthew 15:21-27 (New International Version)

 

21Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. 22A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, "Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession."

    23Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, "Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us."

    24He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel."

    25The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said.

    26He replied, "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs."

    27"Yes, Lord," she said, "but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table."

 

This passage will lead us to ask Christians at large and those who have converted to Christianity that according to the above passage, you all are dogs in the eyes of Jesus for being Gentiles. He shows no compassion for a demon-possessed girl who happened to be Canaanite and not a Jew or one of the sheep of Israel. So, how do you think that you can achieve salvation for following Christianity and/or allegedly Jesus? Jesus has explicitly told that he was sent to the Jews only, and/or the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and not the Gentile dogs, the Canaanite (or Syro-Phoenician) women.

 

Christians claim that Jesus is ‘Son of David’ and the irony of this claim is that “David” was half Moabite (half Gentile) {to be exact half Arab}. Ruth was David's grandmother, and she was a Moabite, and she is portrayed as the most righteous woman in the Bible.

 

One example of these racist, anti-Gentile laws (Gentiles are ‘unclean dogs') despite the fact that King David was ‘a half Moabite’ is found in Deuteronomy 23:3 [New International Version]

 

    3 No Ammonite or Moabite or any of his descendants may enter the assembly of the LORD, even down to the tenth generation.

 

No wonder Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 and proved himself to be truthful according to Deuteronomy 23:3 cited above.

 

5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.

 

Now the Christians almost all of them are not Jews and/or of the house of Israel. They are rather Gentiles, who have chosen to blindly follow Jesus. Therefore, how can they be sure about their salvation? Let us read and compare John 3:16 that is always quoted as Christians’ ticket to salvation.

 

KJV John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.


3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

 

There has always been a serious problem with the word everlasting used in 3:16 above. But the major problem lies in the verse 3:17 where the word might is used.

 

The word “might” is a clear proof that salvation by following Christianity and believing in Jesus is not only highly questionable but is contrary to the fact.

 

The word might is the past tense of word may, which is used in the English language to indicate a condition or state contrary to fact. Please keep this in mind that this is not my opinion, it is a fact that can be verified by using any good English dictionary or grammar rules book. Let me quote the American Heritage Dictionary to prove my point:

 

might2 (m؛t) aux.v. Past tense of may1. 1.a. Used to indicate a condition or state contrary to fact: She might help if she knew the truth. b. Used to indicate a possibility or probability that is weaker than may: We might discover a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. 2. Used to express possibility or probability or permission in the past: She told him yesterday he might not go on the trip. 3. Used to express a higher degree of deference or politeness than may, ought, or should: Might I express my opinion? [Middle English, from Old English meahte, mihte, first and third person sing. past tense of magan, to be able. See MAY1.]

 

Now who want to believe in something like John 3:16 that Jesus was alleged son of god or god himself, but John 3:17 tells us that salvation is not a matter of fact but rather it is contrary to the fact.

 

3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

 

Why would some one follow a religion in which salvation is not possible and is contrary to the fact according to John 3:17; let alone guaranteed? Adding insult to injury, the exclusiveness of all perks is only for the Jews, while Gentiles are dogs.

 

Christianity is a very unintelligent religion that is why it always attracts those who cannot think and process. Will you in your right mind, if told be a dog, which does not deserve any compassion and mercy for being allegedly demon-possessed; will accept this man named “Jesus” as your savior and/or god and/or Son of God believing that you will achieve salvation through Jesus. In case, your answer is yes than you need to have your head examined and you really need professional help.

 

Next time, when a Christian missionary try to save you and/or ask you to convert to Christianity; you must remember Matthew 15:21-27, especially Matthew 15:26 & John 3:17 to be exact.

 

Sunday, May 08, 2005

 

Home Page