Why did Muhammad take up arms and Jesus didn't?
Anyone who asks this as a
question or makes a statement to this effect is one of the two kinds:
1.
He or she is incredibly
ignorant of his or her Scripture i.e. New Testament
2.
He or she is lying trough his
or her teeth
First let me state few facts before I present the proof
against this absurd claim. To learn that how cruel
and insensitive Jesus was, click here.
This
means Jesus knew about Jewish Law as it was the custom and expected from any Jewish
male of the time. According to Gospel of Matthew (5:17-19) Jesus explicitly
stated that he came to uphold the laws of the prophets. Means Jesus refers, of
course, to the commandments of Jewish law, namely the Laws of Moses. Several of
these Laws of Moses are about Holy War, killing of unbelievers and apostates.
So Jesus was well aware of what Jewish law stated, and even according to the
gospel he explicitly said he had not come to cancel this law.
Jesus took-up arms and attacked
the Temple with his gang!
On the Sabbath day according to
Bible Jesus and his army attacked the Temple when it was extremely busy as we
read in the Bible, the account of this attack:
The three synoptic gospels tell us
an account of terrorist attack by Jesus on the temple. We read in:
Mark: 011:015 And they come to
Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them
that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the
moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves;
011:016 And would not suffer that any man should
carry any vessel through the temple.
Luke: 019:045 And he went into the temple,
and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought;
*Before this attack Jesus has already ordered
in same chapter for killing of his enemies:
Luke: 019:027 But those mine enemies,
which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them
before me.
Matthew: 021:012 And Jesus went into the temple
of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and
overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold
doves,
John: 002:013 And the Jews' Passover was at
hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
002:014 And found in the temple those that sold
oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting:
002:015 And when he had made a scourge of
small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen;
and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables;
002:019 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy
this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
NOTE: In chapter 2 of John, Jesus' behavior is more likely
of a "juvenile delinquent" who goes to a party (wedding), demands
wine. When his mother informs him that the hosts don't have wine, Jesus insults
his mother followed by his alleged miracle of changing water into wine. The
wine well liked by guests. This raises the question that if it is true than why
Jesus asked for lesser quality wine comparing to his alleged wine of miracle?
Nevertheless, Jesus after getting drunk goes to Temple with his gang and
unleashes his terrorist attack on the Temple, it is by the way
"Passover" day. That means Temple is very crowded and filled with
pilgrims for all over.
Luke: 022:036 Then said he unto them, But
now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he
that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.
022:037 For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet
be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the
things concerning me have an end.
022:038 And they said, Lord, behold, here
are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough.
The above verses clearly prove that Jesus was
on rampage by over-turning the tables, throwing seats of moneychangers etc. But
that is not it, as we see in the above verses that Jesus besieged the whole
huge Temple allowing no one to come in and go out, he is physically assaulting
people in the Temple and destroying their property. We also see that John is shining more light on this
terrorist attack in which Jesus is lashing, bashing and trashing the Temple and
claiming to be the king of Jews. This terrorist attack on Temple resulted in
death of hundreds of people. We know it cannot be carried out alone that means
Jesus probably has his rebel army with him. There is no evidence that Christian
god died for original sin, he rather committed a felony of high crime and
treason and was sentenced to death. We also see that Jesus was uncooperative
and arrogant with authorities during investigation of this attack as we read
further these chapters.
Jesus
hated the children Muhammad didn’t!
Baby killer Jesus
according to Bible:
Following verses tells us that Jesus is not
only threatening to punish adulteress, but also threatening to kill the
children of those who commit adultery.
Rev: 002:020
Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that
woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my
servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.
002:021 And I gave her
space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not.
002:022 Behold, I will
cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great
tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.
002:023 And I will kill
her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which
searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according
to your works.
The
facts cited above obviously prove that the person advancing the above-subjected
notion is either ignorant of Bible or lying through the teeth. I would advise
the questioner to get his/her facts straight.