Jesus, Jihad and Jizyah!
بسم الله
الرحمن
الرحيم
الحمدلله
رب العالمين
والصلوة
والسلام على اشرف
الانبياء
وسيدالمرسلين
نبينا محمد صل
ا لله عليه
وعلى آله
واصحابه
وازواجه
اجمعين -
امابعد
All the praises and thanks be
to Allaah, Sustainer of the Universe, and blessing and salutation to be the
most distinguish of the Messengers and foremost among the Prophets, our Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allaah be on him and on his wives, children and
Companions.
Everything about Biblical Jesus is a myth, while the realities about Jesus have been successfully hidden by the masses especially the believers of Jesus (myth). The very first highly questionable thing about Jesus is, his alleged miracle birth without a father. There is no historical record available to learn about the life of Jesus except some cock and bull stories doctored by the Christian missionaries to deceive masses. It leaves us to examine the only source available to us, which is the Christian Bible i.e. New Testament.
Were the Gospels Inspired?
Upon close examination of New Testament, we learned that the God did not inspire the gospels. Christian Bible {New Testament} never claims itself to be the word of inspiration. 2 Timothy 3:16 is the only verse in the entire NT on which Christians’ so-called claim of inspiration is based upon,
3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and
is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness:
2 Timothy 3:16 is the reference to Old Testament, because New Testament was not yet fabricated in the way it is known today. A 2nd century writer named Justin Martyr has further elaborated this idea, his further clarification is that this inspiration is attributed not to the actual Hebrew text, but only to the accuracy of its translation into Greek. {See Helmut Koester, “What Is- And Is Not-Inspired”, Bible Review, vol. xi, no. 5, October 1995, p. 18}
Christian scholars and Christian missionaries often pepper their writings with the term of ‘inspiration’; for example P.W. Comfort states that, “certain individuals…were inspired by God to write Gospels accounts to substantiate the oral tradition.” {See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 3} And again, the scribes copying the New Testament at a later stage “may have considered themselves to have been inspired by the Spirit in making certain adjustment to the exemplar”. {See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 5} But the anonymous authors of the four gospels might very well have disagreed with P. W. Comfort. The earliest gospel, Mark, was scavenged as source by the later ghost authors of Matthew and Luke, who altered, omitted, and abbreviated many of Mark’s stories. Such treatment would never have taken place had they thought that God inspired Mark, or that his words were the unqualified truth. {See Helmut Koester, “What Is- And Is Not-Inspired”, Bible Review, vol. xi, no. 5, October 1995, pp. 18, 48}
Having observed that these claims of inspiration in the New Testament
have no legitimacy, let us now examine,
how Christians until now have handled these fabricated gospels and consider
whether this treatment is congruent with what a sacred text deserves?
According to P.W. Comfort, the gospels were first known in Christian circles orally before finding their way to the written page. {See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 3} Not a single book from the New Testament has survived in the original author’s handwriting, the closest thing being a fragment dated c. 100-115 and containing six verses of John 18. {See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 3-4}
A note about date: The date c. 100-115 is a pure guesswork, because the
manuscript does not contain any Christian date, as the calendar
system had yet to be invented. Thus, these dates based on guesswork may
well be off with a marginal difference of decades to centuries.
Non-professionals who rarely checked for errors afterwards made copies of various books from the NT extensively throughout the first several centuries, generally. There was a little incentive to check them anyway: almost all Christians during the first century expected the impending return of Christ, and likely never realized that they were preserving a text for the distant future. {See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 6} After some time, the text in circulation no longer bore strict resemblance to the work, which had been original authored, so that any scribe duplicating a parchment with great fidelity was not necessarily creating an accurate reproduction of the original. {See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 7} Additionally, “the early Christians did not necessarily treat the NT text as a ‘sacred’ text”{See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 6} one whose every letter was fixed and holy. They may have felt themselves inspired, on occasion, to make alterations to the parchment that lay before them. {See P.W. Comfort, Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations of the New Testament, Baker Books, 1990, p. 6}
The above facts undeniably prove that the anonymous authors of gospels were not inspired. Christian Trojan horse 2 Timothy 3:16 is a reference to Old Testament, thus, cannot be accepted as an evidence of New Testament being the inspired word of God.
Biblical account about the conception of Jesus leading to his birth is absolutely sexually explicit and graphic from total human point of view. Thus, after reading that no sane person will even give it a thought to be inspired by the God, let alone believing in that. Let us examine Biblical verses on this subject that we find in the gospel according to Luke:
1:28 And the angel came in unto her, and
said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord
is with thee: blessed art thou among women.
Luke 1:28: New American Standard Bible (NASB)
And coming in, he said to her,
New King James Version (NKJV)
28And having come in,
the angel said to her, "Rejoice, highly favored one, the Lord is with you;
blessed are you among women!"[1]
Footnotes
1:28 NU-Text omits blessed are you among women.
American Standard Version (ASV)
28 And he came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that
art highly favored, the Lord is with thee.
Young's Literal Translation
(YLT)
28 And the messenger having come in
unto her,
said, `Hail, favoured one, the Lord [is] with thee;
blessed [art] thou among women;'
Darby Translation (DARBY)
And
the angel came in to her, and said, Hail, [thou] favoured one! the Lord [is] with
thee: [blessed art *thou* amongst women].
Wycliffe New Testament (WYC)
28 And the angel entered to her, and said, Hail, full of grace; the Lord is with thee; blessed be thou among women.
To further cement our claim that the above
statements about Mary’s sexual encounter with an alleged “angel”
was not an inspiration by God. It was
rather documented from human point of view suggesting explicitly that Mary had
sex, as in all quotations cited above from the different Bibles (versions) it
is explicitly and exclusively stated with an absolute human touch that
“the so-called angel and/or messenger”
(i) entered her,
means penetrated in Mary’s vagina (ii) had orgasm inside her (iii) and/or
had ejaculation. For further proof let us
examine other verses in the Bible used for identical implication, as we read
in,
Deuteronomy 22 {KJV}
22:13 If any man take a
wife, and go in unto
her, and hate her,
Deuteronomy 25 {KJV}
25:5 If brethren dwell
together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall
not marry without unto a stranger: her husband's brother shall go in unto her,
and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto
her.
Genesis 38 {KJV}
38:8 And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother's
wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to
thy brother.
Similar verses are found in the Bible at many
places. In the above verses we notice that verb *go is used in injunctions
and/or clarification etc. When a phrase/sentence begins with verbs like go & come followed by in,
in unto, entered in, entered unto, entered unto her, came into her etcetera
that is explicitly means a sex act with penetration and ejaculation/orgasm.
The above accounts from the very Bible
conclusively prove that the alleged miracle birth of Jesus is merely a
myth. Nevertheless, we have not solved the mystery; in fact, our dilemma has
just begun because we find nothing about Jesus’ alleged childhood and/or
youth, until he appears on the scene as an adult perhaps in his late twenties
or early thirties. Christian scholars have different opinions based on pure
guesswork and not facts. But at this point the plot thickens since we have many
more Jesus’ during this time, therefore, the task to pin point the
Jesus of Christianity becomes literally impossible as we explore
further.
In the Gospel according to Matthew we read ►1: 21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his
name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.◄ Matthew fabricated this myth
by borrowing the Isaiah
7:14, which reads ►7: 14 Therefore the Lord himself
shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and
shall call his name Immanuel. ◄ This is how the “Immanuel”
of Isaiah 7:14 became the “Jesus” of Matthew 1:21. Most of
the NT is the fabrication from OT using the reverse engineering process. But
what Matthew has conveniently interpreted as Jesus is originally “Joshua”
(meaning: YHWH {Yahweh} is salvation). However, according to the
Encyclopedia
Jesus is not the one who brought the Injeel (انجيل)
that was revealed to Isa عليه
السلام. Let us read the
Matthew 1:21 with previous and latter verses where the context and complete
thought is found.
1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of
the LORD appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear
not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.
1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his
name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
1:22 Now all this was done, that it might be
fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,
1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and
shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being
interpreted is, God with us.
NOTICE:
Matthew
1:22-23 is a direct explicit reference to Isaiah 7:14. Whereas Matthew 1:20 explicitly states that that
Jesus was fathered by Holy
Ghost. Contrary to that we find a contradicting
story in Luke 1:28 we have cited earlier in this treatise.
Another dilemma Christians have is that there are
more than one Christ (Anointed) in the Bible, as we read:
In 1 Kings 1 (1:39 And Zadok the
priest took an horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon. And they blew the
trumpet; and all the people said, God save king
Solomon.) King Solomon is the Christ. In the same chapter some one else is also
a Christ as we read: (1:45 And Zadok the priest and Nathan
the prophet have anointed him
king in Gihon: and they are come up from thence
rejoicing, so that the city rang again. This is the noise that ye have heard.)
In 1 Kings 5 we read (5:1 And Hiram
king of Tyre sent his servants unto Solomon; for he
had heard that they had anointed
him king in the room of his father: for Hiram was ever a lover of David.)
Also see: 1 Sam 10:1; 12:3, 5;
15:17; 16:6, 13; 2:10, 35; 24:6 & 10. Isa 45:1, Nu 3:3 and dozens of other
places in the Bible.
Now my questions to Christians:
1. 1.
According to the Bible and
history Jesus is a very common name, so how the alleged Immanuel
became Jesus? Where is the evidence of name change from Immanuel to Jesus?
2. 2.
"Christ (Anointed)" is used for dozens of many others in the
Bible, so why you claim that “Christ” is unique?
How Jesus can be son of David, when Davidic dynasty ceased to
exist centuries before Jesus?
According the biblical books of
Ezra and Nehemiah, those who returned from
ą. Ezra 1:8, 11; 2:2; 3:8; 4:2, 3; 5:2, 14, 16; Neh 7:7; 12:1, 47.
˛. Haggai 1:1, 12, 14; 2:2, 4, 21, 23; Zech 4:6, 7,9, 10.
Question
to Jews:
According to Old Testament as quoted above, David’s descendants ceased to exist, then why are you waiting for an imaginary messiah from the house of David, who will NEVER come?
Question
to Christians:
You
love to claim that Jesus
is the son of David. How Jesus can be son of David, when Davidic dynasty
ceased to exist centuries before Jesus?
Another fact that need to be considered.
How the Messiah Can be From
The following statement is found in the Gospel according to Matthew:
KJV/Matthew: 2:23 And
he came and dwelt in a city called
The
above statement is absolutely false, since we can’t
find this statement in any of the books of the prophets.
Jews also deny the validity of such prediction. According to the Jews it is
simply a false claim. On the contrary
they had a firm belief that no prophet would ever come from Galilee, not to say
of
KJV/John: 7:52 They
answered and said unto him, Art thou also of
Therefore, the Christian Bible
itself testifies against Jesus, proving his falsehood. John 7:52 is the nail in the head of Christianity (an
outbreak of falsehood).
The evidence presented above
from the Old Testament proves that the myth of coming of Davidic messiah is
rather a local Jewish legend. Historically, Jews have always been causing
mischief on earth resulting in the punishment of God according to the Bible,
which is full of curses and abominations. Thus, Jews have always folklores
and/or legends for a savior or some one who will bail them out at the time of
trouble, contrary to what their own Scripture says,
which Jews don’t bother to read and learn.
At this point we have conclusively
established using Judeo-Christian sources that Jesus is a myth and
there have been about nineteen Jesus during that
time. We will assume at this point that Jesus of Christianity was a Jew
and was raised like any other Jewish boy of that time, though we find no
evidence in the Bible, supporting this notion, beside a fraudulent and/or
forged genealogy of Jesus. Thus, this would mean that Jesus was well aware
of Jewish Laws and Customs, beside that gospel according to Matthew {5:17-19}
also confirms this,
17
"Do
not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to
abolish them but to fulfill them.
18
I
tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter,
not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means
disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
19
Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and
teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven,
but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the
kingdom of heaven."
But we know for fact, that Jesus
never lived by the Jewish law and never uphold the law, he rather abused and/or
break every law. New Testament is full of such accounts, but discussing that is
outside the scope of this treatise, thus, we will leave that for some other
time.
Romans were the occupiers and the rulers of the holy land during that the time all these nineteen Jesus’ existed and Jesus’ upbringing as a Jewish boy that is further confirmed in Matthew 5:17-19 quoted above, Jesus refers, of course, to the commandments of Jewish law, namely the Laws of Moses. Several of these Laws of Moses advocate Holy War, the killing of unbelievers and apostates. So Jesus was well versed of what Jewish law commands Jews to live by, and even according to the gospel he explicitly said he had not come to cancel this law.
Therefore, the irony of Jesus being claimed by the Christians as so-called Jew, Jewish Messiah, seed of David, Son of God and/or God incarnate; is that:
That would lead us to ask the most logical question to the
Christians that why their so-called Son of God and/or God incarnate {100% God
and 100% human} would abandon his allegedly “chosen people” (the Jews) and let them
live under the bondage of Romans. Jesus not only remained mute rather participating, to be exact leading
the Jews as an alleged so-called Jewish Messiah; in the holy war
against Romans
to liberate alleged God’s chosen people (the Jews). Jesus adding insult to injury advised
contrary to that telling the Jews to pay Jizyah to the
Roman, as we read in the New Testament,
Jesus commanded to pay Jizya جزية to Caesar, as we read in the New Testament,
Matthew 22:17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?
Matthew 22:21 They say unto him, Caesar‘s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar‘s; and unto God the things that are God’s.
Mark 12:16 And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar‘s.
Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar‘s, and to God the things that are God’s. And they marvelled at him.
Luke 20:22 Is it lawful for us to give tribute unto Caesar, or no?
Luke 20:24 Shew me a penny. Whose image and superscription hath it? They answered and said, Caesar‘s.
Luke 20:25 And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the
things which be Caesar‘s, and unto God the things which be
God’s.
It is inevitable to mention few facts that will certainly differentiate
between a true Prophet of Islaam and a the false prophet Jesus, who always
avoided Jerusalem, because Jerusalem has always been a focal
point of all Israelites prophets, but Jesus
avoided Jerusalem as any other city because it was a city of Pharisees (who
have repeatedly debunked Jesus), disputers, scribes, unbelievers, and shallow
believers. Socialism preached by Jesus
does not address villagers, but inhabitants of large cities. Contrary to that
Muhammad صلى
الله عليه
وسلم goes to the
Jesus
never preached and Christianity has never reached the full conscientiousness of
one true God. In fact, Christianity has only a vivid concept of the divine and
not a clear idea of God. The mission of Muhammad صلى
الله عليه
وسلم
was to make the gospels’ image of God clearer and closer to the human
mind and thought that Jesus failed to accomplish. In the
gospels’ God is so-called father; in the Glorious Qur’aan, God is
master. In the gospels God is vaguely loved; in the Glorious Qur’aan, God
is loved clearly and respected.
Jesus
taught that the Christian God is the lord of the individual world (people
and souls) only, while Lucifer holds the reins of the material world. That
is why the Christian belief in God preconditions inward freedom, while Muhammad
صلى الله
عليه وسلم taught that the Islaamic belief in
Allaah implies a demand for the outward freedom as well. The two essential
dogmas of Islaam الله
اكبر (Allaahu Akbar God
is the Greatest) and the aqeedah لااله
اللّله (la ilaha illallah
There is no deity but Allaah) are at the same time two
most revolutionary devices in Islaam. While Jesus
preached and practiced turning the family against each other, not letting
people say farewell to their families and preventing people from burying their
dead father; Muhammad صلى
الله عليه
وسلم taught (notice the six commands in a single verse),
Surah An-Nahl 90
إِنَّ
اللَّهَ
يَأْمُرُ
بِالْعَدْلِ
وَالْإِحْسَانِ
وَإِيتَاءِ
ذِي
الْقُرْبَى
وَيَنْهَى
عَنِ
الْفَحْشَاءِ
وَالْمُنْكَرِ
وَالْبَغْيِ
يَعِظُكُمْ
لَعَلَّكُمْ
تَذَكَّرُونَ
Verily, Allâh enjoins Al-‘Adl (i.e. justice and worshipping none but Allâh Alone - Islâmic Monotheism) and Al-Ihsân (i.e. to be patient in performing your duties to Allâh, totally for Allâh’s sake and in accordance with the Sunnah (legal ways) of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم in a perfect manner), and giving (help) to kith and kin {1} (i.e. all that Allâh has ordered you to give them e.g., wealth, visiting, looking after them, or any other kind of help), and forbids Al-Fahshâ’ (i.e. all evil deeds, e.g. illegal sexual acts, disobedience of parents, polytheism, to tell lies, to give false witness, to kill a life without right), and Al-Munkar (i.e. all that is prohibited by Islâmic law: polytheism of every kind, disbelief and every kind of evil deeds), and Al-Baghy (i.e. all kinds of oppression). He admonishes you, that you may take heed.
{1} (V.16: 90) Degree of kinship: First of all, your parents, then your offspring, then your brothers and sisters, then your paternal uncles and aunts (from your father’s side), then your maternal uncles and aunts (from your mother’s side), and then other relatives.
In the gospels we find the frequent
rhetoric based on certain words like blessed, holy, angel, eternal, life,
heaven, Pharisee, sin, love, repentance, forgiveness, mystery, body (as the
bearer of sin), soul, purification, salvation and so on. In the
Glorious Qur’aan, the same terms are based on an image of the world, the
foreground of which is now occupied by entirely definite and realistic terms
such as: reason, justice, health,
weapons, battle position, strength, buying, contract, pledge, writing,
cleanliness, force, struggle, trade, fruit, decisiveness, caution, punishment,
profit, revenge, hunt, medicine, and so on.
We can draw similar conclusions by comparing Mosque and Church. A Mosque is a place for people, while a church is “God’s temple.” In the Mosque, an atmosphere of rationality prevails; in a church it is an atmosphere of mystery and mysticism. A Mosque is always the focus of activity, close to the market and at the heart of the settlement, while the church seems too elevated for a similar position. The architecture of the church tends to stress ceremonious silence, darkness, height, and a hint of the “other world.” Contrary to that in a Mosque, people are supposed to discus certain very earthly issues after the prayers.
The facts presented above proves
without a shadow of a doubt that “Jesus” of the New Testament, if he ever existed was anything but:
Contrary to that New
Testament tells us that:
Jesus was an apostate, if he was a Jew
Jesus was a coward and insensitive to human suffering
Jesus was a
draft dodger, since Old Testament drafts all adult Jewish male to fight the
holy war and kill the infidels.
Jesus was not freedom lover and never wanted Jews to be liberated from Roman bondage
Jesus was not a result of miracle birth.
Jesus was not a Jewish Messiah
Jesus taught to pay
Jizyah rather
being free
Jesus taught and condoned it is OK to live under occupation
Jesus avoided the Jihad like any draft dodger and/or coward
In conclusion, how can a sane person believe, Jesus to be Son of God and/or God incarnate?
The facts from the Christian Bible explicitly tells us that Jesus (a myth) was
not even close to be a righteous man, let alone anything that is claimed about Jesus in Christians’ cock-a-mamie story about their so-called god Jesus. Will you, in your right mind
follow such a
man as your class president and/or a team leader, let alone
worshipping him as God?
Saturday, February 12, 2005